If you're willing to spend $$$$, the best of the best is Heckler & Koch. The USP Compact in .45 ACP is shown in this thread:
http://www.nloc.net/vbforum/showthread.php?s=&postid=79543#post79543
The Sig Sauer line of pistols, I would probably rate next highest, though as was mentioned, they are quite costly. Not as costly as H&K, however.
Ruger makes a line of handguns that are among the strongest built. Their revolvers are legendary for strength and it appears that their auto line is enjoying the same reputation. I've personally shot the P-89 9mm and it was amazingly accurate. Ruger simply doesn't make a bad product. They also simply don't make an auto that lends itself to concealed carry, as they are all too large for my liking. If size is not important, they should definitely be considered. I believe they will soon start to shrink their autos in the wake of new concealed carry laws.
Taurus handguns have the best warranty in the business. I personally own 2 for concealed carry. A PT-22 which is a great little .22 cal auto with a tip-up barrel and double action only. Also a PT-111 Millenium 9mm, which is one of the most concealable 9s I've ever seen. The PT-92 that was mentioned is a full size auto and a direct copy of the Beretta 92. In it's infancy in the 70s, Taurus was copying Beretta and Smith and Wesson for it's designs, but still offering that terriffic warranty, which was what finally put them up with the big boys. Slight design improvements over the Beretta with a cheaper price made them quite attracticve. Beretta also had to come out with their own stainless version of their 92 because of Taurus. Everyone that owns Taurus products that I know has nothing bad to say about them.
Judgement call on whether you should look at Smith & Wesson. Many are boycotting them for their sell-out to the Clinton-Gore administration. I personally have 0 Smiths in my inventory, but their full line of autos are quite good and deserve a look.
This is presupposing that you are looking for a double-action auto. If single-action carry doesn't bother you, then you would look at Kimber's line of 1911 style pistols. They are the very best, and quite expensive. Colt and Springfield Armory are very close in accuracy, workmanship and durability and IMO rank right up behind Kimber. 1911s are still and probably always will be my all-time favorite handguns, they're just not very fast to get into action unless you carry them "cocked and locked."
There are many other makes out there and some will stand up to scrutiny and others will fail miserably. Glock's "safe action" is tested everyday by today's police forces, but some gun professionals swear they're an accident waiting to happen. I don't own a Glock simply because I don't like the way it fits my hand, which should be the most important consideration for you. It's the reason I went with the H&K over the Sig.
I hope this helps clear things up from mud to merely dirty water, but remember when being thrifty, you get what you pay for. If you can't afford a Sig or an H&K, don't bypass everything in between and buy a Jennings.
