Dry NOS vs. wet NX, Sal? anyone?

[Bulldog]

have NOS dry...tried to dyno last night...having problems after 3k rpm with funky power curve waver....instead of spending a lot of time figuring out the problem maybe i'll just upgrade to a NX wet kit? from what i understand they are kinda foolproof?

 

[1badtk]

The wet system is more efficent and produces more HP. It is also a lot safer system to run. You will be very happy with the NX wet shot.

 

[BigVito]

I reallly dont care much for the bottle but Id go wet

 

[Odin's Wrath]

Anybody running a combo of both wet and dry? I've seen this setup on some of the faster f-bodies. What would the benefits be?

Roger

 

[1badtk]

Anybody running a combo of both wet and dry? I've seen this setup on some of the faster f-bodies. What would the benefits be?

Roger

Sounds redundant to me.

 

[FlashSVT]

Some great info @ http://www.n2o.org/

 

[Odin's Wrath]

I guess they don't want all the power at once. Just for an example, say someone wants a fifty shot down low because anything more would cause them traction problems; but, they could handle more so they have more introduced when they get into the higher rpm range. Two systems seems like the simplest way to do this.

Dry vs wet at Holley.com
http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLine/Products/NOS/dryvswet.html

 

[Odin's Wrath]

Joe,

I used to see them in GM high-tech performance all the time with that set up. I'm not sure what the benefit is. I'm just not able to get past the obvious I guess. I'm also aware of the staged kits. Just never used the stuff before; so, I'm not especially familiar with it. I guess I didn't really have to tell anyone "that" though. I wonder what the benefit is anyway. There has to be one or so many magazine class vehicles wouldn't be using the set up.